Johnson v. Anheuser Busch, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
876 F.2d 620 · 1989
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 12 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 120 Wash. 2d 120 - Commodore v. University Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (1992), McCormick v. AT & T Technologies, Inc. (1991)
31 federal appellate · 12 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck · Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Count III, alleging tortious interference with contractual relations, requires an examination of the collective bargaining agreement and the scope of the employment relationship.... This count is inextricably intertwined with the collective bargaining agreement and is preempted by section 301.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determine the merits of this allegation would require us to decide whether his discharge was warranted under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'inextricably intertwined with consideration of the terms of the labor contract,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.