Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 F.2d 683 - Swenson v. Sullivan

Swenson v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

876 F.2d 683 · 1989

Citation profile

170
cited by 170 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

75 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 170 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 15229b v. Dar Lester, 15161b v. Dar a Smolen

75 federal appellate · 9 district ·

73019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Pierce v. Underwood · Gallant v. Heckler · Sprague v. Bowen · Cotton v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 170 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial evidence means 'more than a scintilla', but 'less than a preponderance.' It means 'such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the ALJ has failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for rejecting such evidence, (2) there are no outstanding issues that must be resolved before a determination of disability can be made, and (3) it is clear from the record that the ALJ would be required to find the claimant disabled were such evidence credited.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “where no useful purpose would be served by further administrative proceedings and the record has been fully developed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.