Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 F.2d 690 - Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.

Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

876 F.2d 690 · 1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2017

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Octopi, Inc. v. Courtney · Dixson v. United States · Credithrift of America, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Mod. 164 the parties settled all claims arising from the performance of Contract 213A except those 'related to defective or nonconforming work accomplished prior to February 28, 1981' that may arise from PDM's failure to implement its quality assurance program properly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “SECTION 6.8. Construction Fund; Application of Proceeds of Sale of Bonds. There is hereby created a special fund of the System to be known as the "Projects Construction Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the "Construction Fund"), which shall be held in trust by the System.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that may arise from [PDM's] failure to properly implement the [QA Program] as set forth in the 2808-213A by reference herein as applicable to this issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.