Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 F.2d 84 - In Re David Stuart Fink, M.D., David Stuart Fink, M.D., P.A.

In Re David Stuart Fink, M.D., David Stuart Fink, M.D., P.A.’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2024

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

5019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland · Andrijevic v. Kelleran · Cablevision Co. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc. · Venturi v. California · Ivory v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal; it is available only in exceptional cases, where there is a “clear abuse of discretion or ‘usurpation of judicial power.’””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.