Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 F.2d 976 - Esch v. Yeutter

Esch v. Yeutter’s Empirical Analysis

876 F.2d 976 · 1989

Citation profile

262
cited by 262 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 90 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 262 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp. (1994), Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United States (2009)

35 federal appellate · 90 district ·

110019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 3831 · 16 U.S.C. § 3834 · 16 U.S.C. § 3843 · 16 U.S.C. § 3844 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 5 U.S.C. § 5596

Relies on United States v. Testan · United States v. Mitchell · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Bowen v. Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 262 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) when agency action is not adequately explained in the record before the court; (2) when the agency failed to consider factors which are relevant to its final decision; (3) when an agency considered evidence which it failed to include in the record; (4) when a case is so complex that a court needs more evidence to enable it to understand the issues clearly; (5) in cases where evidence arising after the agency action shows whether the decision was correct or not; (6) in cases where agencies are sued for a failure to take action; (7) in cases arising under the National Environmental Policy Act; and (8) in cases where relief is at issue, especially at the preliminary injunction stage.”
    50 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any loan, or price support operation, or the amount thereof, when officially determined in conformity with the applicable regulations prescribed by the Secretary....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.