United States v. Goris’s Empirical Analysis
876 F.3d 40 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Fulmer · United States v. Graham · United States v. Ross · United States v. Caro · United States v. Chiaradio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the government must permit the defendant to inspect ... data, ... tangible objects, ... or copies or portions of any of these items, if the item is within the government's possession, custody, or control”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In order to uphold a district court's denial of a request for additional discovery, we do not demand epistemological certainty that no discoverable information was withheld from the defendant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the item is material to preparing the defense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.