Mathias v. Superintendent Frackville SCI’s Empirical Analysis
876 F.3d 462 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2107 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Brecht v. Abrahamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'fairly present' ... a federal claim's factual and legal substance to the state courts in a manner that puts them on notice that a federal claim is being asserted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“had a substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the State has actually passed upon the claim,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.