Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 F.3d 596 - Schilling v. Schmidt Baking Co.

Schilling v. Schmidt Baking Co.’s Empirical Analysis

876 F.3d 596 · 2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 254 · 49 U.S.C. § 13102 · 49 U.S.C. § 31502

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc. · Tennessee Coal Iron Co v. Muscoda Local No 123 Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co · Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he text of the TCA plainly provides that employees working on mixed fleet vehicles are covered by the TCA exception.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in whole or in part , is ... that of a driver, driver's helper, loader, or mechanic ... affecting the safety of operation of motor vehicles [with a GVWR of] 10,000 pounds or less in transportation on public highways in interstate or foreign commerce ...., and [the employee] performs duties on motor vehicles [with a GVWR of] 10,000 pounds or less.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “plaintiffs [who] spent the majority of their working hours making deliveries, and between 70% and 90% of their delivery trips were made on vehicles indisputably weighing less than 10,000 pounds”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.