United States v. Raza’s Empirical Analysis
876 F.3d 604 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2025
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act)
Relies on Neder v. United States · Kungys v. United States · Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar · United States v. Brien · United States v. Colton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“faces a heavy burden, for we accord the district court much discretion to fashion the charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.