Eichenberger v. ESPN, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
876 F.3d 979 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681E · 18 U.S.C. § 2710 (§ 2 of the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press · Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins · Federal Election Commission v. Akins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“privacy torts do not always require additional consequences to be actionable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“personally identifiable information concerning any consumer of such provider.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Violations of the right to privacy have long been actionable at common law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.