Blizzard v. Dalton’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 38 U.S.C. § 2012 · 38 U.S.C. § 4212 · 38 U.S.C. § 4214 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Cort v. Ash · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Matkari · Prewitt v. United States Postal Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“enlarge the waiver in the Rehabilitation Act 'beyond what the language of the statute requires,' " Majority Opinion, at 1297; and there was no need for Congress to provide a private cause of action as part of VEVRA since a person aggrieved under VEVRA is at the same time aggrieved under section 501(b), and since "section 505(a)(1) of the Rehabilitation Act provides that individuals aggrieved under section 501(b) of the Act, can seek redress through a private right of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Antol v. Perry“Plaintiff's allegation that he suffered discrimination under the disabled veterans portion of the 'Section 501(b) Plan' allows him access to the rights and remedies contained in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Antol v. Perry“[A]ffirmative action protection for disabled veterans ... comprises part of the Department of [Defense]'s affirmative action plan under section 501(b) of the Rehabilitation Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Antol v. Perry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.