Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 NE2D 376 - Brown v. Alexander

Brown v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Campbell v. State · Lance Raygor et al Vs University of Minnesota a Minnesota State University · Galbreath v. City of Indianapolis · Geyer v. City of Logansport · Thompson v. City of Aurora

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “describe in short and plain statements the facts on which the claim is based. The statement must include the circumstances which brought about the loss, the extent of loss, the time and place the loss occurred, the names of all persons involved if known, the amount of the damages sought, and the residence of the person making the claim at the time of the loss and at the time of filing the notice.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) An offender must file an administrative claim with the department of correction to recover compensation for the loss of the offender’s personal property alleged to have occurred during the offender’s confinement as a result of an act or omission of the department or any of its agents, former officers, employees, or contractors. A claim must be filed within one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of the alleged loss. (b) The department of correction shall evaluate each claim filed under subsection (a) and determine the amount due, if any. If the amount due is not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), the department shall approve the claim for payment and recommend to the office of the attorney general payment under subsection (c). The department shall submit all claims in which the amount due exceeds five thousand dollars ($5,000), with any recommendation the department considers appropriate, to the office of the attorney general. The attorney general, in acting upon the claim, shall consider recommendations of the department to determine whether to deny the claim or recommend the claim to the governor for approval of payment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Substantial compliance focuses on the nature of the notice itself, and is concerned with the extent to which the form, content, and timing of the notice complies with the requirements of the notice statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.