Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 N.E.2d 776 - Casper v. L.E. Isley & Sons, Inc.

Casper v. L.E. Isley & Sons, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spaulding v. International Bakers Services, Inc. · Baker v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP. & MONSANTO CO. · Walker v. State, Muscatatuck State Development Center · DePuy, Inc. v. Farmer · Roberts v. ACandS, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we do not grant the same degree of deference to the Board's decision as we would if the issue were of fact, because law is the province of the judiciary and our constitutional system empowers the courts to draw legal conclusions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.