People v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stull v. People · Kogan v. People · Thomas v. People · Woertman v. People · People v. Aldrich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he jury was not instructed that defendant's conviction of the predicate offense had to be based on an act which occurred after the passage of this portion of the statute,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“cannot be expected to relay in detail the dates of the various incidents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Whitman“was given the general time frame within which the assaults occurred”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Whitman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.