Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 P2D 707 - Malone v. State

Malone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Nguyen v. Reynolds B (1997), Bland v. Sirmons (2006)

5 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

4901994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Furman v. Georgia · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Woodson v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as well as other relevant conduct relating to the safety of society as a whole”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “present sufficient evidence concerning prior convictions or unadjudicated crimes to show a pattern of criminal conduct that will likely continue in the future”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"It is beyond dispute that the trial court must instruct the jury on every degree of homicide where the evidence would permit the jury rationally to find the accused guilty of the lesser offense and acquit him of the greater." Shrum, 1999 OK CR 41 , ¶ 6 n. 2, 991 P.2d 1032 , 1034 n. 2. (Emphasis added.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.