Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

876 So. 2d 1281

Knadle v. Kennedy

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-07-16

Decided 2004-07-16

PER CURIAM.

¶1DENIED.

SHARP, W., and PLEUS, JJ., concur.GRIFFIN, J., dissents with opinion.
GRIFFIN, J.,

¶2dissenting.

¶3In my view, there is more to judicial oversight of discovery than just protecting privileges or trade secrets. Issues of cost, burden, relevance and ulterior motives also require attention, especially when non-parties are involved. To do this accurately usually requires more time than trial judges have to devote to it. This ease appears to me to be an unhappy example.

/876/so2d/1281 · .json · Public domain