876 So. 2d 146 - State v. Landry’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Manson v. Brathwaite · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm · 775 So. 2d 1022 - State v. Casey · 669 So. 2d 364 - State v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order to show prejudicial error sufficient to warrant reversal, the defendant must show that the testimony the witness would have given would have been favorable to the defense and would indicate the possibility of a different result.” State v. Landry, 03-1632, p. 11 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/19/04), 876 So.2d 146, 153 , writ denied, 04-1586 (La.11/15/04), 887 So.2d 474 (citing State v. Stevenson, 02-79 (La. App. 5 Cir. 4/30/02), 817 So.2d 343 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.