876 So. 2d 362 - Wright v. Quesnel’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Sanders · Burns v. Washington Savings & Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'n · 457 So. 2d 941 - Dennis v. Searle · 762 So. 2d 302 - Miller v. Meeks · 754 So. 2d 1136 - LW v. McComb Separate Mun. School Dist.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had enough information at the time of the death such that she knew or reasonably should have known that negligence had occurred.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the statute [of limitations] should begin to run when the plaintiff should have reasonably known of some negligent conduct, even if the plaintiff does not know with absolute certainty that the conduct was legally negligent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is not enough to trigger the statute of limitations that the claimant is aware of his injury if he is unaware of the act or omission which caused the injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.