876 So. 2d 607 - Franklin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Duckworth v. Eagan · 874 So. 2d 1225 - Roberts v. State · 872 So. 2d 611 - Perry v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Application of the test requires an examination of the entire record by the appellate court including a close examination of the permissible evidence on which the jury could have legitimately relied, and in addition an even closer examination of the impermissible evidence which might have possibly influenced the jury verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dendy v. State“the defense offered ninety rights forms obtained from federal and state law enforcement agencies. Eighty-nine of the ninety forms properly indicated that the suspect could consult with a lawyer during questioning. Only the form utilized in [Franklin] omitted that portion of the Miranda warning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“he had a right to have an attorney present during questioning and that an attorney would be appointed to represent him if he could not afford one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.