876 So. 2d 614 - West v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Dickerson v. United States · California v. Prysock · Bridgers v. Texas · 739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Officer: Okay. All right. So I’m gonna go ahead and read this from this prepared text. All right. Before I ask you any questions, I want to advise you of your constitutional rights. Officer: You have the right to remain silent; do you understand? Defendant: (Nods head.) Officer: Yes or no? Defendant: Yes. Officer: Okay. Anything you say can be—can be used against you in a court of law; do you understand? Defendant: Yes. Officer: Okay. You have the right to talk with an attorney present prior to and during any questioning, if you wish; do you understand? Defendant: Yes. Officer: Yes or no? Defendant: Yes, sir. Officer: Okay. All right. If you can’t afford an attorney, one will be appointed to—to represent you before any questioning, if you wish; do you understand? Defendant: Yes, sir. Officer: Okay. Knowing and understanding each of your rights, as I’ve explained them to you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney present? Defendant: Yes, sir.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The warning then in use did not advise Ripley that he was entitled to have counsel present during questioning or that he could stop the interrogation at any time during questioning. We have previously held that this form is legally inadequate to comply with the requirements of Miranda .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e hold that an individual held for interrogation must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation.... As with the [other] warnings ... this warning is an absolute prerequisite to interrogation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.