Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

876 So. 2d 701

Docket No. 1D04-0007.

Wright v. State

Paul WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-06-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2009

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-06-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Paul Wright, pro se, petitioner.

¶2Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Shasta W. Kruse, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4By petition for writ of mandamus, Paul Wright seeks an order compelling the Gulf County Circuit Court to rule on a motion to correct illegal sentence he filed in October 2002. While we recognize that the delay in ruling is at least partially attributable to the state's failure to respond to orders directing it to address the merits of petitioner's claim, the circuit court is nonetheless obligated to rule on the matter before it in a reasonable time. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of mandamus, and direct the circuit court to promptly enter an order disposing of the pending motion to correct illegal sentence.

¶5BARFIELD, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

/876/so2d/701 · .json · Public domain