Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 1047 - Simms v. Sullivan

Simms v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

877 F.2d 1047 · 1989

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
July 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 48 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Butler v. Barnhart (2004), Williams v. Shalala (1993)

9 federal appellate · 48 district ·

28019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Poulin v. Bowen · Gordon v. Schweiker · Brown v. Bowen · Diabo v. Secretary of Health Education and Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a disability proceeding, the ALJ “has the power and the duty to investigate fully all matters in issue, and to develop the comprehensive record required for a fair determination of disability.” The Commissioner’s ultimate determination will not be disturbed if it is based on substantial evidence in the record and correctly applies the relevant legal standards.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only if [her] physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that [she] is not only unable to do [her] previous work but cannot, considering [her] age, education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial gainful work which exists in the national economy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to rule anew (at step five) on [the claimant's] ability to perform `other work.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.