Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 1058 - Littlewolf v. Lujan

Littlewolf v. Lujan’s Empirical Analysis

877 F.2d 1058 · 1989

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Narragansett Indian Tribe v. National Indian Gaming Commission (1998), 30 F. Supp. 2d 24 - Cobell v. Babbitt (1998)

12 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

1101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 25 U.S.C. § 331 (White Earth Reservation Land Settlement Act of 1985) · 25 U.S.C. § 372 · 25 U.S.C. § 462 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 2501

Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Morton v. Mancari · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations · Rostker v. Goldberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven if we assume arguendo that the six-month limitations period is unreasonably short and that, as a consequence, the Act effectively ‘takes’ the Band members’ property rights, we conclude that the statute provides the Indians with just compensation”); cf. Michel v. INS, 206 F.3d 253 , 260 n. 4 (2d Cir.2000) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “find[ing] it unnecessary to address the difficult questions raised by appellants regarding the Due Process adequacy of the period provided by the Act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.