Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 1428 - Thomas v. Douglas

Thomas v. Douglas’s Empirical Analysis

877 F.2d 1428 · 1989

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
3
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Brooks v. City of San Mateo (2000), Steiner v. Showboat Operating Co. (1994)

25 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions

2801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Hensley v. Eckerhart · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A constructive discharge occurs when, looking at the totality of the circumstances, 'a reasonable person in [the employee's] position would have felt that he was forced to quit because of intolerable and discriminatory working conditions.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'aggravating factors,' such as a 'continuous pattern of discriminatory treatment.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whether working conditions were so intolerable and discriminatory as to justify a reasonable employee’s decision to resign is normally a factual question for the jury. In general, however, a single isolated inci dent is insufficient as a matter of law to support a finding of constructive discharge. Thus, a plaintiff alleging a constructive discharge must s¿k / some aggravating factors, such as a continuous pattern of discriminatory treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.