Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 162 - United States v. Jacobowitz

United States v. Jacobowitz’s Empirical Analysis

877 F.2d 162 · 1989

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
January 2021
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably United States v. Maldonado-Rivera (1990), United States v. Concepcion (1992)

24 federal appellate · 3 district ·

30019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1644 (§ 134 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1029

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Schmerber v. State of California · Manson v. Brathwaite · Gilbert v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[w]ith intent to defraud' means that the offender has a conscious objective, desire or purpose to deceive another person, and to induce such other person, in reliance upon such deception, to assume, create, transfer, alter or terminate a right, obligation or power with reference to property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any access device that is lost, stolen, expired, revoked, canceled, or obtained with intent to defraud....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.