Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 32 - Robinson Brothers Drilling Inc Lowrey v. Upg Inc

Robinson Brothers Drilling Inc Lowrey v. Upg Inc’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
April 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Sulmeyer v. Suzuki (1994), Spadas' Committee v. V Spada R Na

2 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Farmers Insurance v. Hubbard · Kenan v. Fort Worth Pipe Co. · McClendon v. Cal-Wood Door · Jet Florida, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc. · Remes v. ACME Carton Corp. (In Re Fasano/Harriss Pie Co.)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a court must measure the value given to the creditor and the new value given to the debtor in determining the extent to which the trustee may void a contemporaneous exchange.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prove the specific measure of the new value given to the debtor in the exchange”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[M]oney or money’s worth in goods, services, or new credit, for release by a transferee of property previously transferred to such transferee in a transaction that is neither void nor voidable by the debtor or the trustee under any applicable law, including proceeds of such property, but does not include an obligation substituted for an existing obligation;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.