Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 463 - Morrison v. Lipscomb

Morrison v. Lipscomb’s Empirical Analysis

877 F.2d 463 · 1989

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Barrett v. Harrington (1997), Cameron v. Seitz (1994)

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

20019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Baker v. Carr · Lemon v. Kurtzman · Boddie v. Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not alter the rights and liabilities of any parties but, rather, instructed court personnel on how to process the petitions made to the court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “between parties who have invoked the jurisdiction of a court....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “on a functional analysis to determine which acts are protected, meaning that one must determine whether the actions are truly judicial acts or 'acts that simply happen to have been done by judges.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.