Garrett v. Lyng’s Empirical Analysis
877 F.2d 472 · 1989
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2019
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 609 (§ 409 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987) · 7 U.S.C. § 2014
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Lukhard v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n initial agency interpretation is not instantly carved in stone. On the contrary, the agency, to engage in formal rulemaking, must consider varying interpretations and the wisdom of its policy on a continuing basis.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ll households with earned income shall be allowed an additional deduction of 20 per centum of all earned income ... to compensate for taxes, other mandatory-deductions from salary, and work expenses ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.