Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 481 - United States v. Runnels

United States v. Runnels’s Empirical Analysis

877 F.2d 481 · 1989

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
October 2006
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2006 · most notably United States v. Frost (1997), United States v. Dandy (1993)

21 federal appellate ·

190198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 29 U.S.C. § 501

Relies on Burks v. United States · Berger v. United States · Griffith v. Kentucky · McNally v. United States · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ne must read the indictment as charging Runnels with obtaining money for himself by devising a scheme which resulted in depriving the union members of their right to an honestly-run union. This clearly is an intangible rights theory.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “readily apparent that the government simply did not proceed on any theory other than a deprivation of 'intangible rights.' " The government's "post-hoc argument that this case proceeded on two theories,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Those cases in which a conviction was based entirely on the intangible rights theory have been overturned on McNally's authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.