Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 717 - Hatfield v. Hayes

Hatfield v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis

877 F.2d 717 · 1989

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Sheppard v. Riverview Nursing Center, Inc. (1996), Jenkins ex rel. Jenkins v. Missouri (1997)

18 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

3001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It follows that one who succeeds in obtaining an injunction under that Title should ordinarily recover an attorney's fee unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “) (citing Newman v. Piggie Park Enters., Inc., 390 U.S. 400 , 402 n. 4, 88 S.Ct. 964, 966 n. 4, 19 L.Ed.2d 1263 (1968) (per curiam)); Wheatley v. Ford, 679 F.2d 1037 (2d Cir.1982) (that an action provided a private benefit to a plaintiff rather than a public benefit to a class of similarly situated persons is not a special circumstance to deny § 1988 attorney's fees); Staten v. Housing Auth., 638 F.2d 599 (3d Cir.1980) (that the case was”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Appellate review of a denial of attorney's fees under Sec. 1988 is governed by the abuse of discretion standard, but a district court's discretion in denying attorney's fees to prevailing parties is narrow.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.