Taylor v. Armontrout’s Empirical Analysis
877 F.2d 726 · 1989
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2000 · most notably Gamble v. Parsons (1990), Collins v. Hesse (1992)
12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Maleng v. Cook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“once the sentence for a conviction has completely expired, an individual is not 'in custody' under that conviction for purposes of habeas corpus attack (and therefore a federal court has no jurisdiction),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is still open to appellant to challenge his [later] sentence, and to assert as a ground for that challenge the invalidity of the previous, underlying 1982 conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allen v. Dowd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.