Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 F.2d 762 - United States v. Pisello

United States v. Pisello’s Empirical Analysis

877 F.2d 762 · 1989

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
December 2015
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably United States v. Monroe (1991), United States v. Sarno (1995)

61 federal appellate · 1 district ·

6201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Holland v. United States · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Stirone v. United States · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A variance between indictment and proof does not require reversal unless it affects the substantial rights of the parties.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the crime charged [is] substantially changed at trial, so that it [is] impossible to know whether the grand jury would have indicted for the crime actually proved.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “may be inferred from conduct such as ... handling ... one's affairs to avoid making the records usual in transactions of the kind, and any conduct, the likely effect of which would be to mislead or to conceal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.