Calderon-Ramirez v. McCament’s Empirical Analysis
877 F.3d 272 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 5 U.S.C. § 555 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1184 (§ 214 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Iddir v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Kubiak v. City of Chicago · Volling v. Kurtz Paramedic Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'accept[s] as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fail[ed] to set forth any facts that differentiate himself from other petitioners waiting ahead of him for adjudication,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gonzalez v. Cissna“wait time [had not] been any more unreasonable than other petitioners waiting in the same line.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gonzalez v. Cissna
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.