United States v. Kizzee’s Empirical Analysis
877 F.3d 650 · 2017
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · Tennessee v. Street · Peoples v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no reasonable possibility that the evidence complained of might have contributed to the conviction.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“out-of-court statements are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted therein, but instead for another purpose: to explain the officer's actions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“exceeding the limited need to explain an officer's actions can violate the Sixth Amendment,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.