Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri · Dye v. State · Laux v. State · Wilder v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the group alleged to be excluded is a “distinctive” group in the community; (2) that the representation of this group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and (3) that this un-derrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury-selection process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Breaston v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.