Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 P.2d 1130 - Mansfield v. Circle K. Corp.

Mansfield v. Circle K. Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2026

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brannigan v. Raybuck · 183 W. Va. 77 - Anderson v. Moulder · Michnik-Zilberman v. Gordon's Liquor, Inc. · Brigance v. Velvet Dove Restaurant, Inc. · 99 Wash. 2d 655 - Young v. Caravan Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “one who sells intoxicating beverages for consumption off the premises has a duty to exercise reasonable care not to sell liquor to a noticeably intoxicated person”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “of a reasonably prudent person under the same or similar circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “as meaning and including 23 beverages containing more than one-half of one percent (1/2 of 1%) alcohol by volume, and not more than three and two-tenths percent (3.2%) alcohol by weight, including but not limited to beer or cereal malt beverages obtained by the alcoholic fermentation of an infusion of barley or other grain, malt or similar products. 24 Defendants argue that the Oklahoma statutory definition of 3.2 beer as a nonintoxicating beverage is incorporated into the contracts of insurance and, therefore, 3.2 beer cannot be an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.