State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · Jusino v. Brown · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · Swint v. Chambers County Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case. The argument shall not appeal to prejudice. The state's rebuttal shall be confined to answering the argument of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'When a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant's own testimony, that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm; or . . . . (2)(b) When the offender is engaged in the perpetration of cruelty to juveniles, even though he has no intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.