877 So. 2d 617 - Preda v. Preda’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 841 So. 2d 1264 - McClelland v. McClelland · 647 So. 2d 756 - Hamilton v. Hamilton · 866 So. 2d 570 - McQuinn v. McQuinn · 582 So. 2d 1125 - Hannah v. Hannah · 716 So. 2d 707 - Curry v. Curry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"There shall be a rebuttable presumption, in any judicial or administrative proceeding for the establishment or modification of child support, that the amount of the award which would result from the application of these guidelines is the correct amount of child support to be awarded. A written finding on the record indicating that the application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate shall be sufficient to rebut the presumption if the finding is based upon: ". . . . "(ii) A determination by the court, based upon evidence presented in court and stating the reasons therefor, that application of the guidelines would be manifestly unjust or inequitable. ". . . . ". . . The court may deviate from the guidelines . . . if evidence of other reasons justifying deviation is presented." 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.