877 So. 2d 663 - Globe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

45 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]his is not a case . . . where the police failed to honor a decision of a person in custody to cut off questioning, either by refusing to discontinue the interrogation upon request or by persisting in repeated efforts to wear down his resistance and make him change his mind.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 111 So. 3d 810 - Braddy v. State · 929 So. 2d 640 - Cuervo v. State

2. “admissions by acquiescence or silence do not implicate the Confrontation Clause.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Hernandez · 42 So. 3d 177 - Twilegar v. State

3. “First, Mosley was informed of his fights both times before questioning began. Second, the officer immediately ceased questioning when Mosley unequivocally said he did not want to talk about the burglaries. Third, there was a significant lapse of time between the questioning on the burglary and the questioning on the homicide. Fourth, the second episode of questioning took place in a different location. Fifth, the second episode involved a different crime.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Pierre v. State · 929 So. 2d 640 - Cuervo v. State