Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 SO2D 71 - In Re DeFrancesch

In Re DeFrancesch’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 459 So. 2d 520 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Whittington · 633 So. 2d 150 - In Re Pardue · 683 So. 2d 714 - In Re Caulfield · 646 So. 2d 343 - In Re Quaid · 597 So. 2d 444 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Boutall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “demand. As in Ashy, there was an element of coercion in DeFrancesch's implied threat that he might cease to represent the client if she did not submit to the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When the client balked at the demand, DeFrancesch assured her that so long as she paid her fee installments on time each week thereafter,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “this will never happen again, okay. But, if you miss, then that's the punishment, that's the late fee, . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.