Totale, Inc. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 625 So. 2d 1283 - Nordyne v. Florida Mobile Home Supply · 231 So. 2d 532 - Dupuis v. 79th Street Hotel, Inc. · Teca, Inc. v. WM-Tab, Inc. · 566 So. 2d 890 - Martin v. Brown · 198 So. 2d 49 - Strickland v. Muir
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the crucial time for the measurement is the time of the fraudulent representation. Later appreciation or depreciation of the property that is subject of the false representation generally does not alter the fraud damage computation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“value of the stock at the time of purchase. Although CPH insisted in oral argument that the stock market was doing well and that there were no non-fraud related factors affecting the stock price during the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The `flexibility theory' permits the court to use either the `out-of-pocket' or the `benefit-of-the-bargain' rule, depending upon which is more likely fully to compensate the injured party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.