Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 So. 2d 856 - Baker v. State

877 So. 2d 856 - Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 831 So. 2d 1263 - Giles v. State · Zuniga v. State · Rich v. State · 858 So. 2d 1103 - Fair v. Crosby · Estevez v. Crosby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The instruction improperly told the jury that the very act Giles sought to justify itself precluded a finding of justification. Essentially, the jury was instructed that [section] 776.041(1) would apply to preclude a self-defense claim, when it is claimed that the acts with which the defendant is charged are themselves committed in appropriate self-defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “However, the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm is not justifiable if you find: 1. Frederico or Cruz Hernandez were attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.