Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

877 S.W.2d 138

State v. Hall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1994

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1994-05-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1995

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-05-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a short barreled shotgun and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. Further, we find neither a jurisprudential purpose nor a precedential purpose would be served by a written, opinion and we affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b); 30.25(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

¶3Judgments affirmed.

/877/sw2d/138 · .json · Public domain