Reese v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2018
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rochin v. People of California · Sorrells v. United States · Hoffman v. United States · Hampton v. United States · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is sometimes necessary to compensate an informant before the informer will agree to undertake the often dangerous task of undercover investigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] witness may not withhold all of the evidence demanded of him merely because some of it may be protected from disclosure by the Fifth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. State“Conduct merely affording a person an opportunity to commit an offense does not constitute entrapment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Zarate v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.