Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 877 SW2D 482 - Amanda v. Montgomery

Amanda v. Montgomery’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2018

21 state decisions

140199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. Packer · Montgomery v. Kennedy · Alexander v. Hagedorn · Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co. · Baker v. Goldsmith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While we believe, as a general rule, discovery is appropriate prior to the pretrial hearing at which the petitioner must prove his prima facie case for bill of review. However, we do not believe that the general rule encompasses serology testing to determine paternity until after the prima facie case has been established. The serological testing would not in any manner aid relator in establishing the elements necessary to show the prima facie grounds of fraud, accident, wrongful act of opposing party, or official mistake.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “For this reason, Texas procedure has always mandated that a petition for bill of review be a new lawsuit filed under a different cause number than the case whose judgment the bill of review complainant is attacking.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Thus, because appellant did not bring his petition for bill of review as a separate action, we cannot consider it here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.