Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Maryland v. Craig · Lilly v. Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defense counsel had the opportunity to cross-examine [the declarant] about her statements, and [the declarant] was available for further testimony. Accordingly, there was no violation of defendant’s confrontation rights. The fact that at the time of tried [the declarant] no longer recalled the statements or events does not alter this conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holliday“took the stand and was subject to cross-examination”); Robinson v. State, 271 Ga.App. 584 , 610 S.E.2d 194, 196-97 (2005) (concluding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holliday
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.