Interpool, Ltd. v. Certain Freights of the M/VS Venture Star’s Empirical Analysis
878 F.2d 111 · 1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2008
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 304 · 11 U.S.C. § 305
Relies on In re Disbarment of Sacco · Cunard Steamship Company Limited v. Salen Reefer Services Ab, United Brands Company, Garnishee · Remington Rand Corp.-Delaware v. Business Systems Inc. · Universal Casualty & Surety Co. v. Gee (In Re Gee) · In Re Axona International Credit & Commerce Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) just treatment of all holders of claims against or interest in such estate; (2) protection of claim holders in the United States against prejudice and inconvenience in the processing of claims in such foreign proceeding; [[Image here]] (4) distribution of proceeds of such estate substantially in accordance with the order prescribed by this title; [and] (5) comity....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.