Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 878 F.2d 134 - Kramer v. Mosbacher

Kramer v. Mosbacher’s Empirical Analysis

878 F.2d 134 · 1989

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 732 F. Supp. 210 - National Fisheries Institute, Inc. v. Mosbacher (1990), 910 F. Supp. 1138 - JH Miles & Co., Inc. v. Brown (1995)

6 federal appellate · 11 district ·

1301989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1852 · 16 U.S.C. § 1854 (International Fisheries Agreement Clarification Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1855

Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Weinstein v. Bradford · Traynor v. Turnage · Alaska Factory Trawler Ass'n v. Baldridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if a petition for such review is filed within 30 days after the date on which the regulations are promulgated.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “except that the reviewing court is without authority to enjoin the implementation of those regulations pending the judicial review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “over any case or controversy arising under the provisions of this chapter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.