United States v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
878 F.2d 311 · 1989
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Sherbondy · United States v. Headspeth · Landreth v. Commissioner · United States v. Chatman · United States v. Portwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“enters or remains unlawfully in a building with intent to commit a crime therein.” Or.Rev.Stat. § 164.215. 3 . Nor does any burglary conviction in this Circuit satisfy the ACCA definition; Chatman’s wake has washed the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not fit the definition of burglary or violent crime”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.