Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 878 F.2d 313 - Molloy v. Wilson

Molloy v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

878 F.2d 313 · 1989

Citation profile

148
cited by 148 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

106 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 148 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Floyd v. Laws (1991), Thomas v. Lewis (1991)

106 federal appellate ·

11001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes · Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc. · Aldrich v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections · Pena v. Seguros La Comercial

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 148 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion.”
    42 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An appeal from a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion brings up only the denial of the motion for review, not the merits of the underlying judgment.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud or other misconduct; (4) a void judgment; (5) a satisfied or discharged judgment; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from operation of judgment.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.